You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Skepticism’ category.

Yes, it is finally up. No need to wait any longer, people. Click right here to be taken directly to the place where you can download the first episode of the official podcast of the Young Australian Skeptics, The Pseudo Scientists. Don’t be discouraged that the first episode doesn’t feature me (or the next episode, for that matter), it’s still a good podcast! No, really, it is!

Plus, with the power of the Internet, you can become a fan of The Pseudo Scientists on Facebook here. If you’re into that sort of thing, of course…


I spent a lot of time on this. A lot. But, finally, it’s here: the complete transcription of the Steven Novella/Rachael Dunlop interview on Episode 6 of the Skeptic Zone podcast. The 50 minute interview took me so much time to do it’s really not funny. Just think of all the blogging I could have done in that time…

Oh well, I guess I owed the guys at the Skeptic Zone something, due to their tireless efforts at putting out such a great podcast every week. Cheers guys. Plus, I also wanted to do it just so I could get in Steve’s good books for when he comes to Australia in 2010…  More of that in the interview.

I thought I might share a little of it with you, to whet your appetite for some hot, hot Novella ranting. The full transcript of the interview can be found here, on the Skeptic Zone website. That’s for those who missed the non-spelt-out URL. How more obvious can I make the plug, guys? Oh, and Steve’s blog is here, at Just, you know, so he knows that I care…

Here it is, a brief snippet of the interview I so lovingly wrote down.

R: Mmm. So that sort of leads me onto the next question, which is about the hijacking of scientific terminology by CAM proponents. Recently, I attended the Mind-Body-Spirit, or -Wallet, festival, as we affectionately call it in Australia-

S: Right. *laughs*

R: -and you’d be amazed, Steve, did you know quantum technology is working in alternative medicine? I don’t know if you’ve heard about this-

S: Oh yeah!

R: *laughs*

S: Quantum technology is awesome, you know, throw the word “quantum” in there and it becomes instant pseudoscience.

R: Oh yeah, it’s fantastic.

S: It’s all about the marketing, which is one thing that the CAM industry does extremely well. It’s all about the marketing. They also have an advantage in the fact that they’re not constrained by things like facts and ethics.

R: Exactly.

S: If you’re not so constrained, you can model your marketing purely for psychological impact. There are certain themes that they follow: one theme is the new gee-whiz technology, and this has been going on for a long, long time, ever since Western science has been institutionalized and in vogue in civilization. So, a hundred years ago, the cutting-edge, science-y kind of treatment was radiation, so there were radioactive tonics that people thought were the latest-greatest thing. A hundred years before that it was electromagnetism, so that’s where Mesmer comes in with his animal magnetism, that you can use to cure just about anything. And now, it’s quantum, Deepak Chopra’s quantum healing, for example. It’s a new way of justifying the vitalistic notions that are thousands of years old, you know, the notion that there’s this life energy. So, now you just throw “quantum” in front of it, and you’ve got quantum life energy. But it’s the same sort of spiritual, pre-scientific notions that were weeded out of scientific thinking over a hundred years ago. But yeah, extremely effective marketing.

Don’t you just love the use of scientific technobabble in alternative medicine? Now I know I’m not alone in thinking that it’s deliciously digusting!

I’ve written a new article on Young Australian Skeptics called “Creationist Argument – Mutations cannot increase information”. You can find it here, if you so wish to read it.

Basically, I’m going to be laying out the foundations of various arguments used by creationists in a way that young people can understand, provided they have a basic understanding of genetics. If they don’t know anything about genetics, it’s probably the case that they’re not interested in evolution very much, and so they wouldn’t read my articles.

We’ve also had two guest articles written already (here and here), and plugs on the Skeptic’s Guide to the Universe, the Skeptic Zone, Bad Astronomy and Teen Skepchick. Much love all around, especially to those teen skepchicks. Just about my age, wouldn’t you think?


I know I blogged about this many months ago on Homologous Legs, but I thought that Informal Skepticism would be a good place to bring it up again.

Monkeybiz is a project that helps South African women earn income through making bead art pieces, such as the one in the photo above, in the style of their local beading tradition. Such art pieces are quite popular around the world, and recently my sister was given one of them as a present: I think it’s a giraffe. Anyway, that’s not the problem, that’s good. Helping disadvantaged people in undeveloped nations is a great thing, and should be encouraged. But here’s the problem (taken from this webpage):

Wellness Clinic

We run an HIV/AIDS Wellness Clinic located in the heart of Cape Town, which provides skills training and HIV/AIDS support for low-income HIV+ women. This thriving centre, started in 2003, caters for 60 women once a week, offering them beadwork training, HIV/AIDS counseling, yoga therapy, homeopathic HIV/AIDS treatment and basic nutrition. Exact! Clothing contributes NutriKing, a nutritious vitamin supplement to our clinic each month, and provides us with t-shirt off-cuts for stuffing for our products and our t-shirt project.

(Emphasis added by me, of course.)

Is this a bad thing? We all know, through common sense, a lack of actual data and Steven Novella, that homeopathy is not effective at treating medical conditions such as AIDS, or anything else that the placebo effect can’t take care of). Homeopathic products are little more than, one would presume, freshly oxygenated water (due to all that succussion) and the good wishes of the practitioner. The AIDS treatments given by this “Wellness Clinic” aren’t going to do anything to help the women who are receiving them, so is this bad?

If the location of the clinic was shifted to a First World country with adequate health care and a reasonable standard of living (*cough* Australia *cough*), then the answer to that question may be different. The taking of homeopathic remedies is only really harmful in two ways: one, if the remedies remove the ability or will to take actual effective medicine to treat the condition, or two, if the remedies cost a large amount of money and deprive them of what little wealth they have. Living in Australia, or, sigh, the US, would allow the first reason to not take homeopathic remedies to apply, as health care is good and the accessibility of real medicine is high. But in a nation such as South Africa, AIDS medication is hard to find, and you would have to guess, expensive because of it. So these women aren’t going to get real medication. Thus, getting homeopathy is not removing their ability to get good treatment.

But what about the second reason? We can discount that due to the fact that the clinic offers the homeopathy free of charge. No money is spent by the women receiving the homeopathy on the homeopathy itself.

Ah, a tough dilemma. But wait, there’s one more reason I forgot to give.

Another way that homeopathy could be dangerous is if the clinic itself could reasonably get some actual treatment at some sort of humanitarian discount instead of the homeopathy. Maybe some homeopathic practitioner persuaded Monkeybiz to buy their products? Hopefully not, but I wouldn’t put it past some of the people who advocate alternative medicines: they actually believe that it helps people, and want to do everything they can to show that it does. What’s better then than some cheery AIDS relief in South Africa? Oh, we’re being so helpful, think the homeopathy advocates.

Can you think of a way in which these homeopathic treatments are bad? If you can, please post a comment.

The Discovery Institute is so closed-minded, you know? I mean, it’s great that they want to teach the controversy about evolution and intelligent design, but what about other legitimate scientific controversies? Educating the public about supernatural creation is all well and great, however, they’re missing out on prime opportunities to also teach:

  • geocentrism,
  • the fall of Atlantis,
  • classical Greek chemistry,
  • the Flat Earth theory,
  • E.S.P’s existence,
  • ancient Egyptian cosmology,
  • the Invisible Pink Unicorn’s existence, and
  • the fact that the Pyramids were built by UFOs

But don’t worry, dear readers, you can pick up where the Discovery Institute left it: just by wearing one of these t-shirts!

Show support for your favourite discarded (pseudo)scientific hypothesis! I know I’m going to kick it old school and get one with this graphic on it:


For those still rooted to their religi-, I mean, scientific cause, you can proudly display your faith with this graphic:


Satan sure loves those fossils!

I wanted to update Informal Skepticism a bit eariler than now, but as it turns out, I picked one of the worst possible times to set up a new blog: right before my Year 12 VCE exams (for those unVictorians who don’t know, the VCE stands for Victorian Certificate of Education, and is the last bit of high school that contains the tests that propels you into university, if you choose to go there). I just did my Psychology exam yesterday and my first Mathematical Methods exam earlier today, so I thought between studying for my second Methods exam (on Monday), I’d tell you all about the skeptical podcasts I listen to.

Podcasts are a great source of skeptical information, right up there with blogs and video-sharing websites, if not higher. The number of podcasts about skepticism and science has increased dramatically over the past few years, and their types have spread out as well, offering dry, humourous, fact-based, opinion-based, single person, group, topic driven or interview driven varieties, with most falling into at least two of those categories. They can also vary in length as well, from five minutes to nearly two hours. This means that, whatever your taste or time constraint, you’ll find something out there that you’ll like.

Okay, so the main podcasts that I listen to, and there are a lot of them, are listed below, with information about their average episode length, their style and their main focuses. While some may argue that some of them, especially the ones about religion and atheism, aren’t truly about skepticism, I tend to lump them together into one bit gooey heap of critical thinking, as they both employ, to me, anyway, the same lines of reasoning to address whether certain claims about the world are true or not.

The Amateur Scientist Podcast

Average Episode Length: 25 – 35 minutes

Style: Two Person Dialogue, Interview, News

Focuses: Humour, Science, Skepticism

The Atheist Experience

Average Episode Length: 90 minutes

Style: Two Person Dialogue, Call In, Topic

Focuses: Religion, Miscellaneous Topics

The Conspiracy Skeptic

Average Episode Length: 20 – 50 minutes

Style: Single Person Monologue, Topic

Focuses: Skepticism

Freethought Radio

Average Episode Length: 40 minutes

Style: Two Person Dialogue, Interview, News

Focuses: Religion

The Geologic Podcast

Average Episode Length: 50 – 60 minutes

Style: Single Person Monologue, News, Sketches

Focuses: Humour, Science, Skepticism, Religion, Miscellaneous Topics

The Infidel Guy Show

Average Episode Length: 60 minutes

Style: Interview, Call In

Focuses: Religion, Miscellaneous Topics

Logically Critical

Average Episode Length: 30 – 60 minutes

Style: Single Person Monologue, Topic

Focuses: Science, Skepticism, Religion, Miscellaneous Topics

The Non Prophets

Average Episode Length: 100 minutes

Style: Group Discussion, News, Interview

Focuses: Religion, Miscellaneous Topics

Point of Inquiry

Average Episode Length: 30 minutes

Style: Interview

Focuses: Skepticism, Religion, Miscellaneous Topics

The Skeptic Zone

Average Episode Length: 80 minutes

Style: Group Discussion, Single Person Monologue, Interview, News

Focuses: Skepticism, Science, Miscellaneous Topics


Average Episode Length: 60 minutes

Style: Two Person Dialogue, Interview, News

Focuses: Skepticism, Science

The Skeptic’s Guide to the Universe

Average Episode Length: 80 minutes

Style: Group Discussion, Interview, News

Focuses: Science, Skepticism

The Skeptic’s Guide 5×5

Average Episode Length: 5 – 10 minutes

Style: Group Discussion, Topic

Focuses: Science, Skepticism


Average Episode Length: 10 minutes

Style: Single Person Monologue, Topic

Focuses: Science, Skepticism

Don't stress.

Informal Skepticism seeks to discuss skeptical, scientific and religious topics in a way that won't make you stay awake at night, increase your blood pressure or cause stress-induced hallucinations.

Updated when the author feels it necessary and is able, which pretty much translates to "random", as he is a high school student.


RSS Naon Tiotami on Twitter

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Add to Technorati Favorites